MPAA my MPAA$$

11 Feb 2004
at around evening time

I saw an add for respectcopyrights dot org while watching 24, which I had TiVoed so I could watch it today. Anyways, there’s this add for respectcopyrights dot org which I’m all for…usually. There are certain instances when copyrights are really just plain stupid, for example, the Disney/Mickey Mouse incident. Back to the main point: the MPAA (Motion Pictures Association of America) is claiming that people stealing movies is bad for them. Well, yes, it is. Studios lose millions of dollars on every film because of pirates and don’t take me wrong, I’m not advocating pirating. However, the MPAA has severe issues with their claims and, to me, it feels like the MPAA is putting up a
facade. The MPAA has 4 main claims:

Cheating ourselves, threatening the livelihood
of thousands, making our computer ulerable, and breaking the law. For the
first claim, the MPAA says: Only 4 out of 10 films turn a profit. If people
take
the films for free and the Studios can’t recoup their investment, they may
not be
able to make the big summer movies we all enjoy so much; the TITANICs, the
SPIDER-MANs, the JURASSIC PARKs. So, not only will the creators lose, in the
end, you, the consumer, will end up with fewer choices at the
multiplex.

I don’t know about you, but I think fewer choices would be good. There are reasons that 40% of all films don’t turn a profit…it’s called sucking! If studios stopped making bad films, they wouldn’t loose as much money. Claim two:

But, when movies are illegally downloaded from the Internet,
these are the people that suffer the most.
It’s the woman who does the make-up,
the guy who rigs the lighting,
the sound technician,
the costume designer,
the set decorator
and the caterer.

What a load of crap. As far as I know, studios are in the business for profit. That means that all the above listed people get paid a flat amount for the work they do. Some actors, directors, and produces might get a percentage of the profits, but everybody else doesn’t. If the MPAA really wants to be fair, how about implementing equal wages across the board. Once every single person on the set gets the same salary and has somesort of profit sharing plan, then the MPAA can bring that topic up. The last two claims fall into the category of scare tactics. Yes, you could download a virus but you probably have anti-virus software…and if you don’t then your stupid, SOL, and probably shouldn’t be even using a computer. If you fall into this category, let me know and I’ll be more than willing to take that computer off your hands. The legal mombo-jumbo is pretty acurate, although somewhat missleading. Most ISP’s try their best to keep customer information private. Take Verizon suing the RIAA. Yep, in a turn of events “Verizon sued the RIAA for citing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (PDF) as a way to subpoena ISPs for the names of their subscribers.” (Wired.com, 2004). And for those who have highspeed access at home, work, or school, don’t worry too much about getting caught. While work and school most likely track who’s using what IP address at what time, those logs won’t stick around for long. It’s too much datajstorage for something too mundane to track. At home, if you have more than one computer connected to the internet, it’s almost impossible for the MPAA to determine what computer was used to download movies illegally without actually having access to the computer itself. And if you notice, I didn’t actually link to respectcopyrights dot org, this was done on purpose. As Verbal might say, “A litte FU from me to the MPAA.”

*Sigh*, I feel a wee bit better know. I know that was long, but it was worth it. In other news, I’m heading off to Colorado next week for 4 some days. I’ll be touring a few colleges, so expect some pictures when I get back. Perhaps the coolest part of the entire trip will be flying to Denver on a 777. I’m so excited!




Hey ya!

17 Feb 2004
in the wee hours
Hey ya!

I’m not what you would call a contempory music aficionado. Most of what I listen to is based on what other people play and what I happen to like. However, I know nothing about who plays what and what band members are in what group and soforth. I have heard Hey Ya, the latest hit from OutKast. I also, by random chance, watched the Andre 3000 perfom the song at the Grammy’s the other week. Today, however, it appears that Native American’s are launching an attack against CBS, OutKast, Arista, and the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences. I’m thinking, “What they heck are you complaing about??” It so happened that OutKast’s little dance routine used war paint, feathers, and fringe. Now you’ve really got to be joking.  Do you think I would get upset if someone were to drink grape juice, or wine, and eat bread in a music video? No! (I’m refering to communion. Grape juice is typically subsitiuted for wine, the blood of Christ) Why? Becuase those things are not specific to my religion and are in public domain, just like fringe, paint, and feathers. Perhaps the only case anyone has is using war paint, but even that is crap. If you want to after someone for using war paint, then you better go after every Major League Baseball player who uses paint under their eyes. “Tom Bee, an Albuquerque record producer and musician…was particularly angered that the dancers who accompanied Benjamin wore feathers, a sacred symbol for Natives.” Yea…you’ve definatly got to be kidding me.




Damn you Best Buy!

26 Jul 2004
just before lunchtime

July 26, 2004

Best Buy Co., Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
P.O. Box 9312
Minneapolis, MN 55440-9312

To Whom It May Concern:

I recently had a rather unusual and disturbing experience at the Best Buy located at 635 Flatiron Marketplace Drive, Broomfield, Colorado today, July 25th, 2004. My experience begins on June 11th in Seattle where I purchased a 3rd Generation 20GB Apple iPod for $399 plus tax. A few weeks after that, I purchased a Service Plan for my newly acquired iPod.

About a week ago, I saw a news report that said that Apple had released their 4th Generation iPods. I was somewhat miffed by this because I had just purchased my iPod less then a month and a half ago and now there is a new iPod that not only has more features, including better lifespan, but is also one-hundred dollars cheaper. A few days later, July 22nd, I decided to call the aforementioned Best Buy location to see what my options where. I ended up speaking to a lady in customer service whose name I failed to write down. I first asked her if they had the new iPods in stock. She said that they did not have them quite yet. Then I told her how I purchased an iPod about a month and a half ago and that the new iPods had just come out and I was wondering what I could do. She asked me if I had a service plan and I said I did. Then she told me that I could bring my iPod in and exchange it for the new one. I asked her if my service plan would transfer over. She asked me how long it was for. I responded that it was a 4 year plan. She then said that I would 3 years and ten and a half months left on for the new iPod.

That brings me to yesterday. I spend a good deal of time transfer all my music from my iPod back onto my computer so that I would not lose it. I then proceeded to the aforementioned Best Buy location and promptly went to the Returns/Exchange desk. I told them that I had talked to someone in Customer Service who said that I could exchange my iPod. They then told me to go wait by the MP3 Section. I waited for a few minutes and then a woman, who I later found out to be the manager of the store, came out and told me that I could not exchange my iPod, despite what I was promised over the phone not even a week prior. I explained my situation, relating exactly what I have told you above. We bickered for a few minutes and then talked with the repair person to see what the requirements where to get the new 4th Generation iPod. I then asked to speak to the manager. She informed me that she was the manager. I asked if there was a regional rep I could speak with and she referred me to 1-888-BEST-BUY. Being a Sunday, your office was closed. I elected to write this letter instead and then to call 1-888-BEST-BUY first thing today.

When I called the 1-888-BEST-BUY, I was given a load of crap. I talked with four different people: Eva, Liji, Brian, and Brandon. Every person I talked to assured me that nothing could be done, despite the fact that a Best Buy employee told me otherwise. They then said that I would have to talk with the store manager, even though the store manager referred me to 1-888-BEST-BUY. To top it all off, Brandon, the last person I spoke with, hung up on me.

All I wanted to was to exchange my iPod. All I got was a bunch of “No, we can�t do that even though someone else in company said yes.” To me, this is two things, plain and simple: 1) Bad business; 2) False advertising. Granted, you didn�t actually take out an ad in the newspaper and declare that users of 3rd Generation iPod�s with Service Plans could exchange them for 4th Generation iPods, however, I was assured by one of your Customer Service Representatives that I could in fact exchange my iPod. When I take my time to copy the music back to my computer and then take my time to drive over to Best Buy using my gas, only to find out that you now want to back out of your original promise, I find that incredibly disturbing, alarming, upsetting, and distressing. Now I�ve taken the time to write you this letter and I will take the time tomorrow to speak with you over the phone. Never again will I place so much trust in your company, a company that I have respected for so long. Before this incident, I revered your company for their outstanding warranty plans. I have purchase a laptop from you about 2 years ago and I had planned on purchasing another one from you within the next 2 months. I have even tried to obtain a job with you, to no avail. But now I have to seriously consider who I want to do business with.

Now comes the remedy. All I would like to do is exchange my 20GB 3rd Generation iPod (retail value $399) for a 40GB 4th Generation iPod (retail value $399). I would also like to have the remaining time of my Service Plan transferred to my new iPod. Upon delivery of the 40GB iPod, I will gladly surrender my 20GB 3rd Generation iPod to whomever you elect. If these conditions are unacceptable, please contact me right away, either by phone: {my phone number} or email: {my email address}.

Because of my experience at Best Buy and 1-888-BEST-BUY, I have elected to contact the Better Business Bureau and the Colorado State Attorney Generals office. I hope that this incident is just an isolated case and that it can be remedied as quickly as it occurred. You have a great company and I would hate to have its name and reputation tarnished by this single incident.

Respectfully yours,

[sig]

Andrew Ferguson

Note: “BestBuy Sux” image is from http://www.bestbuysux.org/. Visit BestBuySux.org for more documented reasons why BestBuy does indeed suck and why BestBuy isn’t the best buy.




7B and a Fat Lady

18 Aug 2004
late at night
7B and  Fat Lady

Well, after much fanageling, I finally got on a flight to Denver. Originally, I
was going to fly standby, but the flights were pretty much booked solid. So I
used some airline points and got a ticket…next to a fat lady. For all those
who don’t know, seat 7B on a 737-300 is the center seat on the left side of the
plane. On United, it also happens to be an Economy Plus seat with 17″ of width.
This lady was obviously larger then that. She easily extended at least 4 inches
into my space (reducing it down to 13″). Her thigh was at least one and a
half times bigger then my head. Furthermore, I couldn’t put my arm rest
down which prevented me from reclining my seat. The list does go on and I have
to admit that times I just wanted to “fall asleep” and plop my head on to her
gushy arm…and then start drooling and refuse to wake up until we landed. To
some of you (perhaps persons with a BMI over 30) might find
this cruel. And it would be cruel if fat people could not control their weight.
Yes, I know that some of it is genetics; but I’m talking about the REALLY large
people who obviously eat $25 dollars worth on the dollar menu. A
poll on Forbes.com
 shows that 51% of people polled think
that airlines should “charge the obese full price for every seat they take up.”
I couldn’t agree more. Southwest airlines has had a policy like that in place
for almost 25 years. Anyways, at least I’m in Colorado now, although the weather
is sucking pretty bad right now. I move in on Friday. Oh crap…




Some people just don’t get it

25 Aug 2004
just before lunchtime

If you’ve known me for any amount of time, you should probably know that I have big issues with copyright laws, specifically the move towards putting power (and money) in he hands of corporate conglomerates and taking it away from the consumer. For those of you who don’t know the basic reasoning behind copyright laws, here’s the basic rundown:

Copyright laws exists to protect a product from duplication for period of time so that the original creator of such item may profit from its development and recoup costs of development (if any). After the period of time has expired, the product become public domain so that others may produce the product (thus making it cheaper to purchase) and to improve upon said product (thus advancing the product).

The latest people to not get this message are Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), sponsors of The Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act (SB2560). The bill “would hold technology companies liable for encouraging people to infringe copyright.” (wired.com) Among other things, such legislation would put the fear of God in to the minds of many developers of network tools that are designed for multi-user communication. It would also hamper the development of file-sharing programs and programs that including file-sharing features. Not suprisingly, many music labels and Hollywood are in support of this legislation, proving that they too just don’t get it. It also proves that the music and movie industry doesn’t realize that antiquated forms of audio transmission, that is CD’s, just don’t cut it anymore…especially at $15+ a pop. Perhaps even more amazing is the similarity to the “1984 Supreme Court Sony Betamax decision, which found that products capable of substantial non-infringing uses, such as home video recorders, are legal.” (wired.com). The “Sony Betamax doctrine” clearly applies to SB2560.

I think that if a Congressman tries to pass a bill that is in conflict with an outstanding Supreme Court Decision, they should be banned from politics for life and assessed a $5 million dollar fine for the time and money of the American people they have wasted.




iPod Saga Continues

30 Aug 2004
in the early evening

My iPod saga continues as my 20GB 3rd Gen iPod still is not working. I’ve taken it to BestBuy several times now, all with no change and I’m really getting fed up. Tomorrow I’m bribing my apartment mate to take to BestBuy where I hope to convince them that they need to replace my iPod, not “repair it” (read as: send to a lab where they can reformat and reinstall, but not actually fix anything). If that doesn’t work, I plan on finding an Apple store where they should be able to replace it on the spot.




When you speak in a monotone voice, I have no idea what you are saying

27 Sep 2004
mid-morning

I got my Calc 1 test back: 52/100. Not the worst score possible. But this score reinforces a few facts about life. First, no matter how hard a student tries, if the teacher sucks, the student will fail. This brings me to my second point, and title of the blog, if you speak in a monotone voice, I have no idea what you are saying. I didn’t realize how complicated speaking is until I started listening to my calculus teacher drone on and on. The fact of the matter is speach is a very complicated activity. The listener is alerted to specific points about what your talking about based on the inflection of your voice. If you speak monotone the entire freaking time, I CAN NOT DECERN WHAT IS IMPORTANT AND WHAT IS NOT. However, knowing me, there is always a solution to every problem, even when there isn’t a problem…or a solution. In this case, I have both. So I’m going to this other Calc class that meets at the exact same time. I’m going to see if I like it, and if I do, I am going to do everything in my power to transfer into that class. Even if the registrar hates me afterwards. I don’t need to take Calc 1 a third time.




Homemade Cookies for Dummies

27 Sep 2004
in the early evening

In the words of Alec Trebek on SNL’s Celebrity Jeopardy, “We have reached a new low.” Indeed. While at Safeway getting my prescription filled, I came across Homemade Cookies for Dummies. Basically, just add water and you have your own homemade cookies, dummy. What has this world come to? Oh that’s right…lazyness and obese people. If you want to complain about it, walk or run on over.




Let’s try this again…ahem: YOU DON’T GET IT SENS. HATCH AND LEAHY

28 Sep 2004
in the early morning

Nothing pushes my buttons like idiots doing blatenly stupid things, except, perhaps, idiots with power doing blatenly stupid things. Such is the case of Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) who are the sponsers of the Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act (SB2560). What is so bad about this particular act? Well let’s start with everything. Yes, everything. There is nothing in this bill that should ever be allowed to see the light of day. The Act is designed ”stop rampant copyright infringement on peer-to-peer networks.” (wired.com, New Induce Act Alarms Foes) However, the scope of the bill goes WAY beyond society defined peer-to-peer networks. The bill would literally end the development of any kind of data sharing programs becuase such a program could be used to illegally transfer music. You have got to be kidding me. I will again default to both the 1984 Betamax Decision and the more recent Federal P2P decision. The ‘84 Betamax Decision “ruled that devices with ’substantial non-infringing uses’ are legal.” (wired.com, Tech Groups Want Induce Hearings). While the August 19th P2P ruling upheld a district courts finding that Peer-to-peer services are legal. Judge Sydney Thomas, one of three judges on the panel overhearing the case noted, “History has shown that time and market forces often provide equilibrium in balancing interests, whether the new technology be a player piano, a copier, a tape recorder, a video recorder, a personal computer, a karaoke machine, or an MP3 player. Thus, it is prudent for courts to exercise caution before restructuring liability theories for the purpose of addressing specific market abuses, despite their apparent present magnitude.” Sounds like he get’s it. I vote Judge Thomas for Senate. Any seconds?




My First, Final, and Only Rant on The 2004 Election

06 Jan 2005
late at night
Possible voting method /></div>
<p>To say this least, this election blew, sucked, chomped, chewed, spit, and swallowed. If you haven’t been following all the news, Washington State finally got a Govenor-elect just last week and even that will probably be contested. One of the issues being brought up time and time again is how can votes be conducted in such a maner as to prevent voter fraud and have every vote counted accuratly while still maintaining voter confidentiality. My third point, voter confidentiality, I think is the most important point because it is one of the underlying principles of democracy. However, this apperently conflicts directly with the need to verify voters. Maybe not.</p>
<p>David Chaum has developed a system the actually looks pretty promissing. Popular Science reported on it a few months back, here’s how it works…or at least how it <i>should</i> work:</p>
<ol>
<li>When you go into the voting booth, you�re presented with an ATM-like screen that lists the candidates. Choose one by tapping that person�s name. A message confirming your choice appears at the top of the screen.</li>
<li>This confirmation is actually two paper receipts, pressed together and then illuminated from behind. Each receipt by itself is an unreadable grid, but when properly aligned, the name you have chosen appears.</li>
<li>The receipts show an apparently random array of boxes, but look closer. Wherever a letter should appear, one receipt is black, the other white. Viewed together, the letters are gray, while the background contains a random pattern.</li>
<li>After voting, you can take either receipt, but as you open the door to get it, the other drops down into the machine to be used in case of a recount. Your receipt contains your vote, but it�s further encrypted to prevent vote selling.</li>
<li>When you get home, you can make sure your vote has been properly counted. Enter the unique serial number on your receipt into a Web site that lists the tallied votes, and an identical copy of your receipt will appear.</li>
<li>In addition, any voter will be able to verify the results of the entire election from their home computer. Elections officials will be required to post the encrypted votes, along with �keys� that can selectively decrypt certain votes. This allows individuals to check that every vote matches up with an encrypted receipt without being able to tell whose receipt it is or which candidate the vote is for.</li>
</ol>
<p>I think this would be a very good voting system because it preserves the confidentiality of the voter while still maintaining the integrity of the vote. Now, the only downside is this system really won’t work for absentee ballots. I wouldn’t do away with absentee ballots because they are a very convienent way to vote, especially if you don’t want to wait in lines or are physically unable to make it to the polling place.</p>
<p>Undoubtedly, there are some flaws with most absentee ballots. However, the overall absentee system is pretty solid and unconfusing, especially in Washington. Given such design, and the relativly low number of people who vote via absentee, I would say that if you can’t figure out how to fill it out correctly, it’s your loss.</p>
<p>It is definatly <i>not</i> the job of election officials to try and interpret the "intent" of the voter.</p>
<p>That’s all I have to say.</p>
				</div>
	
								
				<small class=Comments : No Comments »