Andrew Ferguson
Rejecting Your Reality and Substituting My Own Since 1986
My Brief Thoughts on Northwest Flight 253

I’m going to keep this short, no more than 250 500 1000 words[1].
As you all know by now, there was an attempt to blow up another airplane. Although it was initially reported someone lighting off firecrackers, it was soon discovered to be a makeshift bomb and “Bomb experts say there was more than enough explosive to bring down the Northwest jet, which had nearly 300 people aboard, had the detonator not failed.”[2]
I haven’t heard much as to the explosive nature of the bomb, other than it was “PETN[3] and possibly a glycol-based liquid explosive”[4] and it was “carried in a soft plastic container – possibly a condom.”[5]
While there may have been enough explosives present by mass to destroy an airliner (and I even have some doubts about that[6], given the lack of calculations I’ve seen), what are the odds[7] of our suspect (or any future suspect) maximizing the effectiveness of such an explosive given their circumstances?
Here’s what I’m really concerned about though: Richard Clarke, former counterterrorism czar and ABC News consultant, has this to say, “We’ve known for a long time that this is possible and that we really have to replace our scanning devices with more modern systems.” Clarke said full body scans were needed, “but they’re expensive and they’re intrusive. They invade people’s privacy.”[8]
Responding to a need for fuller and more frequent body pat-downs and scanning, Rep. Peter King of New York, the top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee, said, “I think we have to head in that direction… Yes, there is some brief violation of privacy with a full body scan. But on the other hand, if we can save thousands of lives, to me, we have to make that decision.”[9]
Why are we continuing to move in a direction that is A) ineffective and B) in violation of our constitutional rights[10]? (See also: A Discussion on the Fourth Amendment and National Security)
In response, the TSA has issued emergency rules that I’m sure will go far in helping keep people safe:
From www.businessweek.com:
Airline passengers traveling to the U.S. from other countries were ordered to remain seated for the last hour in flight, and were limited to one carry-on item in response to an attempted terrorist attack yesterday on a Northwest Airlines flight to Detroit from Amsterdam.
New U.S. Transportation Security Administration rules also prohibit passengers from getting anything from their carry-on bags or having anything in their laps in the final hour of flight, the agency said.
Bruce Schneier, an internationally renowned security technologist and author, had this to say in response to Northwest Flight 253 and the new TSA rules:
From www.schneier.com:And what sort of magical thinking is behind the rumored TSA rule about keeping passengers seated during the last hour of flight? Do we really think the terrorist won’t think of blowing up their improvised explosive devices during the first hour of flight?
For years I’ve been saying this:
Only two things have made flying safer [since 9/11]: the reinforcement of cockpit doors, and the fact that passengers know now to resist hijackers.
This week, the second one worked over Detroit. Security succeeded.
Now is not the time stripping more of my rights away in the name of security; I’m and sick and tired of being treated like a criminal. (My new policy: “Do I have the right to refuse this search?”)
Now is the time establish a new type of a system; a system that works. I don’t have all the answers, but I do know that what we have now and the path we’re on is ineffective and needs to change.
And may God help whoever tries to blowup a plane I’m on; because I will own their sorry ass.
Thumbnail: “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!” from Network (1976), released by MGM. © 1976 MGM.
- including quotes and footnotes [↩]
- Officials: Only A Failed Detonator Saved Northwest Flight [↩]
- NB: Same explosive Richard Reid used in 2001; gee, taking my shoes off during screening really helped prevent that from happening again… [↩]
- U.S. Airline Security Reviews Under Way [↩]
- Official: Explosive PETN Used in Attack [↩]
- PETN – hard to detect and just 100g can destroy a car [↩]
- The Odds of Airborne Terror [↩]
- Officials: Only A Failed Detonator Saved Northwest Flight [↩]
- U.S. Airline Security Reviews Under Way [↩]
- “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” – Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution [↩]
Tags: Bruce Schneier, Fourth Amendment, Homeland Security Committee, Northwest Airlines 253, pentaerythritol tetranitrate, Peter King, PETN, Richard Clarke, Richard Reid, security, Transportation Security Administration
What I’m Not Doing Today
For the first time in, well, 17 years or so, I’m not going to school.
Sometimes, it seemed like I’d never get from here:
to here:
It still hasn’t quite set in yet, maybe by lunch time it will.
And if you thought the last five years were awesome? I can’t even begin to image what God has in store for the next five.
The Molehills are Still Real
The other day we were discussing a talk given by Naomi Wolf about her book The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot where she lays out what she sees happening in America and a fascist America in 10 steps.
The question at hand was, more or less: are the arguments that Naomi Wolf presenting accurate?
Without going into too much detail about our discussion, I want to reiterate a great point that Mark made. To paraphrase Mark, “She’s definitely making mountains out of molehills. But the molehills are still real.”
So often we, the people, are so caught up in disproving the mountain that we forget the molehill still exists. People, for whatever reason, tend to blow things way out of proportion and instead of saying, “You may be right, but you’re blowing it out of proportion,” we say, “No, you’re wrong,” without ever stopping to question if there may be truth to their fundamental argument.
And this isn’t limited to one particular party or ideology either. Conservatives, Liberals, Libertarians, and even those without a side…everyone is doing it. So please stop. Your real message was lost long ago.
Tags: Mark Schuldt, Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot
Education: What’s It Worth?

Editors Note: This post is written by Shaun Rowsell and is part of the 5th 20 Something Bloggers Blog Swap. Shaun Rowsell can regularly be found on his own blog at 20Something Gamer.
Remember when you’d be in a restaurant or a garage and your parents used to say to you “If you don’t do well in school this is where you’ll end up”?
I used to believe that statement, so I studied hard in school, got good enough results to get into a top university and I have finished my second year of a computer sciences course.
And where have I ended up, you may (or may not) ask? In a garage, working for the same people my Mum used to say didn’t do well in school.
I am in this position due to the recession we are currently in. Companies only want people with experience to fill posts, most manual labour jobs are given to foreigners who will work twice as hard for half the pay (don’t get me wrong, they’re nice people and do some AMAZING work), and stores claim I’m “over-qualified” to work there.
This begs the question… Nowadays, what is an education worth? Or does £3000[1] a year just get you a piece of paper to hang next to your McDonalds uniform?
One great thing though, about being like this, is when the new generation of parents say to their children, “If you don’t do well in school this is where you’ll end up” I can turn to the parent and say, “I have a University Degree, your kids gonna end up here no matter what!”
- ~$5000 USD [↩]
Tags: 20SB, blog swap, Shaun Rowsell
The Esoterics of Image Sharpening
I’ve been working on clearing out my huge backlog of photos. I’ve been trying to streamline my process as much as I can in order to get the pictures out the door. As it stands right now, I use no fewer than four programs to get a picture from my camera to the internet:
- Adobe Lightroom: 99% of all editing
- Adobe Photoshop: Image sharpening
- Microsoft Pro Photo Tools: Geotagging
- Flickr Uploadr: Image uploading
There’s some overlap in what Lightroom and Photoshop can do in terms of sharpening. However, I was curious to see what the actual differences are.
On the right is the regular image, as exported from Lightroom, with no sharpening.
In the middle is the image exported from Lightroom with the maximum amount of sharpening for the screen[1].
On the left is the regular image, as exported from Lightroom, with the 100% of the “Smart Sharpen” filter applied with default settings.
Here’s the image at 100% normal:

Can you tell the difference?
Here’s the same image, enlarged to almost 250%:

Looking at the eyes, you can definitely tell the difference. It also make a big difference in the hair too. However, I wonder if the Photoshop Smart Sharpen is adding too much grain? Sure, the eyes don’t look as good, but the cheeks seem more natural.
Like I said, esoteric.
Another issue also cropped[2] up with the differences in saving a JPEG at “12″ (super best quality, there is no higher quality) versus “8″ (just high quality). As it turns out, not as much difference as I had expected. The file size is also reduced by about 7 times as well.
Another thought, what happens when you save a JPEG over and over again? Hadto solves the question, or raises more questions, with his video Generation Loss, in which he “Open the last saved jpeg image. Save it as a new jpeg image with slightly more compression. Repeat 600 times”:
Generation Loss from hadto on Vimeo.
And yes, these are honestly the things that keep me awake at night.
Tags: Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Photoshop, compression, Flickr Uploadr, JPEG, Microsoft Pro Photo Tools
On Reaching the Mean and the Effect of Self-awareness
Editors note: Here’s a short essay that I wrote for my Introduction to Ethics course. It’s not profound or anything, but I think it’s worth sharing.
After discussing “The Particular Virtues of Character,” in Book II, Chapter 7, Aristotle wonders, “How Can We Reach the Mean?” In Book II, Chapter 9 of Nicoachean Ethics, Aristotle writes, “…virtue of character is a mean…between two vices, one of excess and one of deficiency; and that it is a mean because it aims at the intermediate condition in feelings and actions.” (Book II, Chapter 9, §1)
While Aristotle’s proposition seems to be simple at first glance, Aristotle admits that it is, in fact, “hard work to be excellent.” (Book II, Chapter 9, §2) Aristotle argues that finding the mean in virtuousness is not as easy as calculating the numeric intermediary of two numbers. In fact, Aristotle even admits that not everyone can find the intermediate. (Book II, Chapter 9, §2)
Since it is so hard to reach the exact intermediary, Aristotle suggests (among other things) that we try our best to get as close as we can, taking “the lesser of the evils.” (Book II, Chapter 9, §4) As a scientist (and engineer), I feel that this approach presents a unique paradox.
In quantum mechanics, the simple act of measuring a particle invariably affects its properties. For example, when a photon has a polarity, the only way to determine what polarity the photon has is to test it by filtering it through a like polarity filter. This, however, is a destructive (destroying the information, not the photon itself) test if the two polarities are dissimilar. In short, we have affected the property of our particle by simply measuring it.
In a similar way, one wonders how being consciously aware of one’s position relative to the intermediate affects one’s virtuousness. Although such influence does not have to be destructive, it could also be constructive.
Aristotle uses the examples of becoming angry, giving and spending money. In the case of giving money, Aristotle measures virtue by how well we give money “to the right person, in the right amount, at the right time, for the right end, and in the right way.” (Book II, Chapter 9, §2)
Let us suppose we have a cat that does not chase down mice; is the cat inherently unvirtuous? How could the cat be unvirtuous? It is not in this particular cat’s nature to pursue mice and, not being aware of itself, it does not know any better; even though cats are supposed to chase mice. So let us assume that the cat is not unvirtuous for this reason.
Now, let us suppose that I do not normally tithe, even though I am a church going person; that is to say that it is not in my nature to tithe. Does this make be inherently unvirtuous? Unlike the cat, I cannot claim ignorance, since I am self-aware. I know that in the Bible, Numbers 18:26 states that I “must present a tenth of that tithe as the LORD’s offering.” (NIV) I am aware that I have fallen short of my obligations, and thus I must be unvirtuous. Is it this self-realizing and self-correcting behavior that allows me to be unvirtuous? One could argue that it is because of my ability to know the difference between right and wrong that I am able to virtuous or not.
Tags: Aristotle, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Introduction to Ethics, LAIS 320, Nicoachean Ethics, photon, quantum mechanics, tithe
Thoughts on the P-I’s Closing

After the Rocky Mountain News closed shop a couple weeks ago, I knew it was only a matter of time before the P-I followed. However, I didn’t expect the P-I to remain with an online-only staff.
But you know what, I’m excited to see what they do. I had the chance to meet Mónica Guzmán (@moniguzman) a couple of months ago. Guzmán is the PI’s first full time online-only reporter (which I read as: first full-time blogger) as the main contributer to The Big Blog. I’ll be honest that I haven’t been following the her blog very much (I have about 175 others that I’m following and I’m trying to cut back), but I think now that the P-I is switching to an online-only format that I will start following TBB.
I think people like Guzmán are the future of what newspapers were.
Jason Preston agrees that the P-I could be on to something:
From eatsleeppublish.com:It looks to me like Hearst is taking a very smart approach to their first online-only big-city daily. This from Michelle Nicolosi, currently Executive Producer at the Seattle P-I:
We don’t have reporters, editors or producers—everyone will do and be everything: Everyone will write, edit, take photos and shoot video, produce multimedia and curate the home page. That’ll be a training challenge for everyone, but we’re all up for the challenge and totally ready to pick up all these skills.
I think this will prove that newspapers can make the jump, if they try.
Finally, I just wanted to point out how cool David Horsey’s final editorial carton was:
Note the eagle, which is usually perched on top of the globe.
Anyway, I’m really excited to see what the P-I does now and that concludes my thoughts.
Tags: comic, David Horsey, eagle, globe, Jason Preston, Mónica Guzmán, Rocky Mountain News, Seattle P-I
Failing with Grace
The other morning, I was thinking about one my goals for this year: Failing with Grace. I don’t think that’s quite right; I think it should be: Failing into Grace.
Tags: fail gracefully
My Life as a Beach Ball
Sometimes, I feel as though my life is like a beach ball. I’m walking along the beach, between the crashing waves and the rocks, carrying my beach ball. Most of the time, I hold on the beach ball because I’m afraid of loosing it in the water.
Every once in a while, though, I’ll toss up my beach ball. The reasons vary. Sometimes out of frustration, sometimes to see what happens, sometimes because I want to. Whatever the reason, I really think I need to let go of my beach ball more often and trust that God (the prevailing Wind) keeps it out of the water. For the times that I do trust God, I’m usually pleasantly surprised at the outcome.
And for the times I’m not, fail with grace.
Tags: beach, beach ball, fail gracefully, God, water
We’re Basically Doomed
“Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, is quoted as saying that we’re basically doomed because, in 2004, U.S. colleges graduated more sports-exercise majors than we did electrical engineers.”
-David Anderegg, Nerds: Who They Are and Why We Need More of Them
Tags: Corinne Johnson, Electrical Engineer, General Electric, Jeffrey Immelt, NERDS, sports-exercise majors
Subscribe to RSS Feed

